Fujifilm XM5 vs X100VI: Which Compact Camera Wins?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZGNOMUV6hM
Watch My Review Here

If you're invested in the Fujifilm ecosystem and love portable cameras, you've likely wondered about the differences between two of Fuji's most compelling compact offerings: the XM5 and the X100VI. While these cameras share similar features on paper, they function in entirely different ways. After extensive testing with both, here's everything you need to know to make the right choice.

Build Quality: Premium Metal vs Practical Plastic

The build quality difference between these cameras is immediately apparent. The X100VI features a premium all-metal construction that feels substantial in hand, complete with weather sealing (when using the proper filter cover). In contrast, the XM5 opts for a "plastic fantastic" approach with no weather sealing whatsoever.

While the X100VI's metal build exudes premium quality, it comes with a significant downside: heat management. The plastic body of the XM5 actually performs much better for thermal regulation during extended video recording sessions.

Screen Technology: The Make-or-Break Feature

Here's where personal preference becomes crucial:

X100VI: Features a tilting screen similar to the XT-series cameras, plus that coveted Electronic Viewfinder (EVF). The EVF is genuinely excellent and adds significant value for photography work, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

XM5: Sports a fully articulating flip screen that's ideal for content creation and vlogging. However, this screen struggles significantly in bright, sunny conditions—you'll find yourself squinting and trying to shield it constantly.

The flip screen does have limitations for traditional photography, especially when wearing a neck strap, as it can get in the way. Many users end up removing their strap entirely when using the flip-out functionality.

Sensor and Image Quality: Closer Than You'd Expect

The specifications suggest a clear winner:

X100VI: 40MP X-Trans 5 sensor
XM5: 26MP X-Trans 4 sensor

However, real-world testing reveals a surprising truth. When pairing the XM5 with a sharp lens like the Viltrox 25mm f/1.7 (available for just $170 CAD), the image quality becomes remarkably comparable. The resolution difference, while present, isn't as dramatic as the megapixel count might suggest.

Key Image Quality Observations:

Sharpness: Very similar when using quality lenses
Colors: The X-Trans 4 sensor in the XM5 might actually produce slightly more pleasing colors
Flare resistance: The X100VI's native lens significantly outperforms third-party options in direct sunlight

Video Capabilities: Different Approaches to 6.2K

Both cameras offer 6.2K video recording, but they handle it very differently:

X100VI:

Uses a 1.23x crop factor
No true open gate recording
Major heat issues: Overheating warnings appear within 5 minutes of indoor 6.2K recording
Requires micro-HDMI for external monitoring
Lacks headphone monitoring port

XM5:

True open gate recording using the full sensor width
Much better heat management (20+ minutes before warnings)
Includes both headphone and microphone ports (standard 3.5mm)
Features "vlog mode" for vertical content creation
Compatible with aftermarket coolers like the Ulanzi Cu

Photography Features: X100VI Takes the Lead

For pure photography work, the X100VI offers several compelling advantages:

Internal ND Filters

This is perhaps the X100VI's killer feature. Having internal ND filters in such a compact camera is unprecedented and incredibly convenient. No more stopping to attach or remove filters—just dial in the ND strength you need.

Additional Photography Benefits:

Built-in flash with TTL support
Optical viewfinder option alongside the EVF
In-body image stabilization (decent, though not Panasonic-level)
Better overall handling for traditional photography workflows

The Usability Factor: Where Each Camera Shines

X100VI Frustrations:

No quick photo/video switching: You must navigate through menus to switch between still and video modes—a major pain point for hybrid shooters
Fixed 35mm equivalent lens: Great if you love this focal length, limiting if you don't
Heat management issues for video work

XM5 Advantages:

Custom modes: Easy switching between photo and video setups using C1-C4 modes
Lens flexibility: Build the system that works for your style
Better video ergonomics and thermal performance
More affordable entry point

XM5 Compromises:

Combined aperture/ISO dial: Some users find the single dial approach annoying
Plastic build quality: Feels less premium but performs better thermally
Problematic microphone port cover: Constantly pops out and feels flimsy

Audio Comparison and Connectivity

The XM5 clearly wins for content creators with proper headphone and microphone ports using standard 3.5mm connections. The X100VI requires adapters for audio connectivity, which adds bulk and complexity to an otherwise compact setup.

Both cameras support USB-C for webcam functionality, though the X100VI may overheat during extended use.

The Verdict: Choose Based on Your Primary Use

Choose the X100VI if you:

Prioritize photography over video
Love the 35mm focal length
Want the best possible build quality and premium feel
Value internal ND filters and the optical viewfinder experience
Don't mind the heat limitations for video work

Choose the XM5 if you:

Need flexibility in lens choice
Do significant video work or hybrid shooting
Want better value for money
Prefer flip-screen functionality for content creation
Plan to do extended video recording sessions

Final Thoughts

Both cameras represent excellent choices within the Fujifilm ecosystem, but they serve different masters. The X100VI is undoubtedly the superior photography camera with premium features that justify its higher price point. However, the XM5 offers remarkable flexibility and better video performance at a more accessible price.

Interestingly, the X-Trans 4 sensor in the XM5 might actually produce more pleasing colors than the newer X-Trans 5, and the megapixel difference is less significant in practical use than specifications suggest.

For beginners or those wanting a versatile hybrid camera, the XM5 represents exceptional value. For photographers who appreciate premium build quality and don't mind the fixed focal length, the X100VI delivers a more refined experience.

What's your take? Are you team XM5 or X100VI? The choice ultimately comes down to matching the camera's strengths with your specific shooting style and priorities.

About This Comparison

This comparison is based on extensive hands-on testing with both cameras in various real-world conditions, from sunny outdoor photography to indoor video recording sessions. All sample images were captured with matching settings to ensure fair comparisons.

Camera Specifications:

Fujifilm X100VI: 40MP X-Trans 5 sensor, fixed 23mm f/2 lens, built-in ND filters
Fujifilm XM5: 26MP X-Trans 4 sensor, interchangeable lens system, flip screen
Test lens used: Viltrox 25mm f/1.7

Support this content: If you found this comparison helpful, consider supporting through the affiliate links below or buy me a coffee!

Have questions about either camera? Drop them in the comments below and I'll do my best to help you decide which one fits your needs.

A little support goes a long way! If you’d like to help me keep creating, you can do so at

https://ko-fi.com/devonzach

Canadian Links

Fuji X100VI : https://amzn.to/4myAAXI

Viltrox 25 1.7 Air: https://amzn.to/3KhnnF9

American Links

Fuji X100VI: https://amzn.to/3KfuE8p

Viltrox 25 1.7 Air: https://amzn.to/42E5JBB